As well as enjoying solid seasons, Stoke and Swansea fans
would have been the most pleased from this betting scheme, with Swansea
returning £23.04 profit and Stoke £22.82. Backing QPR each week would have lost
you £14.24, even more misery for Hoops fans.
Despite winning the league Chelsea would have only won
you 29p from a weekly bet, going into each game Chelsea were fancied to win so
the odds of them doing so were considerably shorter than for say Stoke. This is
a pretty interesting way of looking at the league, it pretty much represents
how well a team did given their expectations.
Swansea and Stoke both overachieved this season and would
have won you money, City and United will be a bit disappointed with their
respective seasons and they would have got you minor losses, as would Arsenal.
Interestingly, backing Southampton would have only won
£0.61, given they were tipped for relegation that’s a bit surprising. What
might have happened here is that given how strongly Saints started the season
the odds of them winning each game have reduced as the season has worn on. For
Swansea and Stoke even towards the back end of the campaign the odds of them
winning matches were high despite them recording impressive results. In order
for a team to make a profit they need to win enough games but do so when they
aren’t favourites.
If you’d backed your team to lose every week you would
have lost money whoever you supported. It’s probably not a wise idea to back a
team blindly every week but if you were going to midtable sides look the way to
go to guarantee you a bit of money.
Team
|
Profit/Loss
|
Swansea
|
23.04
|
Stoke
|
22.82
|
Crystal Palace
|
14.84
|
Tottenham
|
5.48
|
West Brom
|
5.43
|
Aston Villa
|
3.14
|
Southampton
|
0.61
|
Chelsea
|
0.29
|
Arsenal
|
-0.46
|
Manchester United
|
-1.13
|
Manchester City
|
-1.18
|
Liverpool
|
-4.13
|
West Ham
|
-4.24
|
Newcastle
|
-5.26
|
Leicester
|
-5.86
|
Burnley
|
-6.30
|
Everton
|
-11.63
|
Hull
|
-12.24
|
Sunderland
|
-13.7
|
QPR
|
-14.24
|
No comments:
Post a Comment